Click. Reality show.
Click. Obnoxious commercial.
Click. Obnoxious commercial almost ending. Married with Children rerun.
Click. Some lame-o talent show.
Click. House Hunters. DESPISE House Hunters.
Click. Obnoxious commercial.
Click. Operation Repo. Please.
Click. Turner Movie Classics – unknown movie already in progress.

“Honey, could you pop in an Alfred Hitchcock DVD?”

I’m so sick and tired of never finding anything decent to watch on TV. Years and years ago, Nick At Nite could always be counted on to entertain me. Dragnet. Mary Tyler Moore. Get Smart. Make Room for Daddy. Now, it seems like all that’s ever on is STUPID George Lopez or a 24 hour Roseanne marathon. Don’t get me wrong, I like Roseanne, but not 12 episodes in a row. Flick on TV Land – Andy Griffith is on that channel, right? Nope, sorry, tonight it’s a Married with Children marathon. Blech.

Pay $40+ per month, there should be SOMETHING fun on to watch…and there is not. I’m not paying for it anymore. The three or four shows I actually watch per month are just not worth it.

I have Hulu.com & YouTube. I have Netflix. I have a gazillion VHS tapes and DVD’s. That’s more than enough, and won’t cost an extra $40 a month.

Buh-bye Cable. Don’t let my remote hit you on your way out.

Yeah, yeah, after a hiatus of nearly six months, I come back to blog about the low life worthless violent thug Maurice Clemmons.  I will no longer use his name  – he’s getting too much glory in his death.   He will be referred to now as “low life worthless violent thug.”

I only have a few bullet points to make and then I’ll be done:

  1. I never really liked Mike Huckabee anyway.  That said, this is not all his fault.
  2. Though I’d like to know why he pardoned this low life worthless violent thug.  Someone’s in jail for 95 years, that means he did some pretty heavy stuff, kwim?
  3. If a low life worthless violent thug is in jail for doing nasty things and suddenly finds Jesus, that doesn’t mean he should be let out of  jail.  He can still hang out w/ Jesus and get to know his Savior better from behind bars and minister to his jailmates, can I have an amen?
  4. I wanna know who thought it was a great idea to just keep giving this low life worthless violent thug a free pass in the 9 years since Huck commuted his sentence.
  5. I, like the rest of the country, kinda knew this low life worthless violent thug would be brought back in a body bag rather than cuffs.
  6. To that, I say “Good riddance of a low life worthless violent thug!”
  7. I thank GOD that my brother, a police officer in Pierce County, is safe.
  8. To the family members, children, parents, and loved ones of the victims: my heart is broken for you, and I am so sorry for the loss of  your loved ones.
  9. Thank you to all the men and women police officers who are always in harm’s way – trying to ensure that we the general public is kept safe.
  10. Now if only our court systems would validate what the police officers across the nation are trying to do by keeping worthless low life violent thugs behind bars, we could make some progress.

Went to see Public Enemies yesterday with a friend.  I have seen some lackluster reviews, giving the film reluctant

The cutest enemy the public has ever seen

The cutest enemy the public has ever seen

stars at best.  I never pay attention to critics; I loved Secret Window, even though critics hated it.  I said to my friend “I’ll pay money to watch Johnny paint a fence, and be glad to pay!”  The fact that this movie is set in one of my favorite time periods is a bonus.  The double bonus is that it’s about CRIME and CRIMINALS – which I LOVE.

So with that attitude, I was looking forward to this movie.  There were many things that impressed me about this one.  The main one was that this movie, rated R, was a gazillion times less offensive and disgusting than PG 13 Land of the Lost.  There was minimal language – in fact, I only heard a few cuss words throughout the movie; I don’t even recall hearing the “mother of all curse words” even once (though it could have snuck in when someone was mumbling…).

Another thing that impressed me was that there was only one love scene, and everyone had clothing on! There was no nudity (though some may argue about that being a plus; I digress!) and the lone scene between John and Billie was short, and sweet and left everything to our imagination.

The third thing that impressed me was that Manhattan Melodrama,

Clark Gable

Clark Gable

starring Clark Gable, made an appearance at the end this film, giving us a subtle-as-a-train wreck clue to what was in store .

I’m sure the release of Public Enemies is why Turner Movie Classics aired this oldie-but-goodie a couple weeks ago.  I loved how Public Enemies included the scene where Blackie iced the guy in the restroom, hiding his gun under a paper towel.

Has anyone else ever noticed that the gangsters and hoods of the 1930’s seemed to have a lot more class than today’s thugs?  They were very spiffy dressers, and they even gave their coats away to their shivering female hostagaes…what gentlemen!

I enjoyed Public Enemies; I savored every bit of Johnny.  It was an enjoyable flick and one I’d like to add to my collection.

That said, I do have some complaints.

  • Not enough of Johnny.  Sure he was the star and in almost every scene.  But he didn’t get to show off his cocky, self assured self very much.  I loved what dialogue he did have, being a wise guy while in custody, but would have really enjoyed a lot more.
  • Not enough back story.  Yes, someone told John Dillinger he was a hero to the American public.  Why?  We didn’t see any Robin Hood type antics here.  There really is no reason for the public to see him as some kind of hero.  I wanted to know WHY the public thought this guy robbing their banks was so incredible.

    I also would have liked to see more history on Dillinger.  One of the most poignant parts of Johnny Cash’s story was seeing how awful his relationship with his father was.  I would have liked to have seen some flashbacks of John Dillinger’s childhood.

  • Poor editing/camera action.  I really hate the jerky, sudden stop/start camera movements.  This is popular nowadays, I know, but it doesn’t allow me to gaze long enough on Johnny.
  • Stupid FBI – can you honestly make us believe that this is the same FBI of Mr. Elliot Ness, of The Untouchables?  Could this have been the same time period in the same city of Chicago, where the Untouchables was taking down Capone, while Dillinger made these FBI G-men look like Keystone Kops?  Please.
  • Melvin Purvis.  I know the guy could not help his bizarre name, but I had to add this in here. I feel sorry for this guy, having such a goofy, pansy sounding name. (Till now, I thought Elliot Ness’ name was a sissy name.)  The end of the movie states that Purvis killed himself in 1960, but reading up on him tells us that it’s not really determined.

    Honestly, if the movie depicted the way the events really happened (ha), then I am surprised he didn’t kill himself sooner.  Maybe Melvin should have enlisted the help of Mr. Ness, instead of that slow talking dope from Texas (I was wishing it was Walker Texas Ranger coming in….)

Overall, I give the movie a B, but mainly because Johnny was there to save it.  I only wish he could have done more.

Occasionally I post comments on a local news station message board. I find that the majority of the posters there are little more than lightweight cyber-bullies.

If you do not agree with them politically, or on anything, for that matter, then you are subjected to what some call

Credit: nouQraz, via Flickr Creative Commons

Credit: nouQraz, via Flickr Creative Commons

“adult conversation” but what I call rude remarks.

They are trigger happy when it comes to biting “sarcasm” – again, a cover for plain old rudeness. They say “I don’t sugar coat, I say it like it is, no boring mamby pamby daycare talk from me!”

Well, I don’t know – I was always taught that adults were supposed to control their tongues. Is being polite boring? Actually, it takes a lot more thought to formulate a strong response devoid of churlishness. Is being rude the only acceptable way to disagree?

One discussion centered around the controversial Gardasil vaccine. There are some very good arguments for not having your child vaccinated, but the only consistent response from the pro-Gardasil people were comments like “paranoid, ignorant, ill-informed.” Not only were these comments on the thread in question, but one poster worked her so-called “adult conversation” into totally irrelevant topics, just to dig at one particular person who was not in favor of Gardasil shots for young girls.

And forget about politics. If you are not 100% in support of Barack Obama or the Democrats in general, you are beyond moronic, and you must of course be in love with George W. Bush. There is no middle ground; the line between intelligence and stupidity stops with Barack Obama.

Before anyone thinks that I lay this rudeness solely at the feet of liberals, think again – I have cringed at the remarks many a conservative has made as well.  Christians are prone to just as much rudeness and ignorance as atheists and agnostics…pro-lifers vs. pro-choicers….young earth creationists vs. any form of evolutionist.

It seems that the basic response in humans is to lash out rather than discuss something controversial without insults.

And what about this – a poster who is known to be ultra-conservative posts a more neutral discussion topic. One of the ultra-liberals skilled at being obnoxious declares something along these lines: “Finally, So-and-So posted something intelligent! I think I’m going to choke.”

Please tell me how that is “adult conversation.” Adult conversation would be “Finally, So-and-So posted something we can agree on!”

Being rude and hurtful is not “adult.” It’s worse than childish, because children at least are not expected to know better. Responding to others with insults displays a lack of intellect as well as poor breeding.

wizzy

Photo Credit: Flickr Creative Commons, nouQraz

I’ve seen the ads for High School Reunion on TV – I never was attracted to this particular “reality” show.

This afternoon while enjoying a partial “snow day” I was flicking through the channels – my old soaps don’t appeal to me since I haven’t watched them in years. Reruns of Green Acres didn’t really appeal to me either. I stopped on an episode of  High School Reunion.

Now I know why my initial response to this show was “ick.”

The only thing terrific about this reunion is that it’s in Hawaii. However, it seems like there are a bunch of 17 year olds in 37 year old bodies. Petty jealousies, crushes, annoyances, etc…

My 20th high school reunion was nothing like this.  First of all, it was not in Hawaii (bummer) but most importantly, it

Me & Princess in High School

Me & Princess in High School

was a lot of fun.  There were people I spoke and laughed with who wouldn’t give me a 2nd glance in high school.  I was so bummed that it was over after just a few hours.  I’m looking forward to the next one.

Watching this show is like driving by an accident scene, and watching what’s going on – you are repulsed and compelled at the same time.

I’m not sure, but I’ll bet some of the other viewers are probably held by the same compulsion.  If my reunions were like this, I’d never go; it’s too much like still being in high school.

wizzy

Over the years, I’ve been obsessed with various Hollywood hunks, including:

  • Clint Eastwood – he makes my day when he squints and waves around that .44 Magnum.
  • Sean Connery – shaken not stirred; the accent is enough to make me shiver.
  • Jimmy Stewart – the under-appreciated reliable guy a smart woman would choose.
  • Cary Grant – he’s suave, sophisticated, and amusing if a bit flip.
  • Johnny Depp – a rogue, a pirate, a guy with great lips.
  • Pierce Brosnan – one of my early Hollywood crushes – I choose to forget that I used to have a crush on Erik Estrada too.

But, hands down, my all time favorite Hollywood Leading Man has got to be

Gene Kelly.  I choose to think of him in the present tense.

He has muscles.

He has a great smile.

He can be tough.

He is not afraid to be sappy and romantic.

He can sing.

And.

He.

Can.

Dance.

gene1

gene2

gene_kelly_45

gene3

Have doubts about him being the best dancer ever?

Well, I have to admit, that Donald O’Connor does awesomely with Gene in this fabulous clip from Singing in the Rain, “Moses Supposes.”  Donald is my 2nd favorite dancer – I never saw the attraction to geeky, gawky, pansy-butt Fred Astaire.

But, check him out here, tap dancing on roller skates. Please ignore the silly song and just watch this awesome routine.

Even Keifer Sutherland’s Jack Bauer can NOT compare to Gene. Just. Can’t. Do. It.

wizzy

Why Did Jack Have Columbo's Coat?

Why Did Jack Have Columbo's Coat?

I was happy that 24 is back. There were many things that amused me, some that puzzled me, and some that annoyed me. Here are my personal “Hits & Misses” in case you care.

  • HIT:  Tony is BACK!
  • Miss: It was neither shocking, nor a surprise – the previews told us about it for months.
  • HIT:  Jack told off a pompous senator during a hearing.
  • Miss: Jack was wearing a tie and had a briefcase.  No hoodie or Jack Sack.
  • HIT:  Jack is quite rude when people harass him about his “techniques” with terrorist suspects.
  • Miss: Jack wore a Columbo-esque trenchcoat, sans wrinkles and cigar, for most of the episode.
  • HIT:  Fibbies think they can “handle” Jack.
  • Miss: There was not even a mention of Chloe.
  • HIT: Jack turned a Bic pen into a potential lethal weapon.
  • Miss: There was no mass destruction, and only three people got killed.
  • HIT: President Allstate is with us, via commercials.
  • Miss: Madame President is less interesting than Wayne Palmer in a coma, if that is possible.

Now, I would LOVE to be wrong about this prediction I’m about to give.  I’ve watched so many of these shows that it’s hard to be surprised anymore, but here’s my theory, and it’s hardly original…

TONY ISN’T REALLY A BAD GUY.  He’s an undercover double agent (gasp!)

Marwan Doesn't "Warn."

Marwan Doesn't "Warn."

My reason for suspecting this is mainly because Tony stopped the collision of the airplanes, and said it was just “a warning.”  Since when do real terrorists give WARNINGS?  Would MARWAN have done that?  HECK NO, he’s have let them crash, killing all the people he could, and everyone watching would have let out a roar of approval.

I was disappointed at the lack of death and destruction on this 24 season premier.  THIS IS WHAT WE’VE COME TO LOVE AND EXPECT from 24.  24 Redemption had a soccer game refereed with machine guns.  What is up? Why such a gentle premier?

And while I LOVE My Tony, I’d really like it to be true that he IS bad.  Nina Myers was one of the best characters ever, and the biggest mistake they ever made, apart from saving Kim and killing Edgar, (and killing Curtis…) was to kill off the lovely-but-lethal Nina.  Jack needs an adversary who knows him inside and out.

Dave Barry’s 24 Blog is the BEST.  Every episode is made even MORE entertaining with Dave’s commentary and everyone else’s comments.  My favorite quote from last night was by SuzyQ:

Aw, Tony came back all mean. Just like the animals who return from Pet Cemetary…”

Steve the 24 Guy – found him last season on Dave’s blog.  He writes AWESOME recaps, that are actually better than the show, esp. since there’s a bit of parody thrown in.  Thanks Steve!

My final note:  Welcome back, Jack – I’ve missed you, and I want to see you shoot some LOTSA thighs, and yell in people’s faces a LOT more.

Brotherly Love

Brotherly Love

wizzy

Actually, I despise winter…unless it’s in Hawaii, rather than the Poconos.